Skip to main content

Don't Listen -- Don't Watch -- Try READING!



I have a suggestion for both my fellow "Liberals" and my "Conservative" friends (and, yes, I do have them.) Stop listening -- don't listen to Limbaugh, Hannity, Alex Jones, Ed : Schultz, Thom Hartmann or any of the dozens of voices squawking their one sided diatribes. Switch off FOX News, CNN, MSNBC and the other thinly veiled heavily spun sources of party propaganda. I have a unique suggestion... don't listen -- don't watch.... READ!!!

Policy discussion really should have no party affiliation. There are many intelligent ways of viewing the world. None of these viewpoints can be arrived at by name calling, paranoid conspiracy theories, fear, and illusion.

For those who identiby as Liberal (Progressive or just plain Democrat), I want to suggestion these sources to better understand the intelligent Conservative Viewpoint:

1. Outside the Beltway: Self described as "...an online journal of politics and foreign affairs analysis. For the most part, our views are Classical Liberal (Jim's Note: libertarian, that is): a strong belief in free trade, limited government, and respect for human rights. We aim to have informed, polite conversation about the issues we find interesting."

2. The National Review: Granted, I most often disagree with their basic premises, but their articles are well written, coherently argued and respectful.

For those who identify as Conservative (Libertarian or Republican), I heartily recommend:

1. Harper's Magazine: As described on their website, "... the oldest general-interest monthly in America, explores the issues that drive our national conversation, through long-form narrative journalism and essays." Harper's includes not only political commentary, but poetry, short fiction, book reviews, and possibly the hardest crossword type puzzle on the planet!

2. The Nation: Offered on the web as, "... the oldest continuously published weekly magazine in the United States, and the most widely read weekly journal of progressive political and cultural news, opinion, and analysis." Disambiguation -- Harper's is "general-interest" and The Nation is primarily commentary... both are the oldest in some sense of the word.

For both Lib-Pro-Dem and Con-Liber-Rep:

1. The Atlantic: If you lean Liberal, you'll think The Atlantic is conservative. If you're conservative, you'll think The Atlantic has a liberal bias. I've subscribed to this magazine for the better part of 40 years when I could afford magazine subscriptions. This magazine shares with Harper's the honor of the hardest crossword on the planet.

2. The Economist: "The Economist considers itself the enemy of privilege, pomposity and predictability. It has backed conservatives such as Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. It has supported the Americans in Vietnam. But it has also endorsed Harold Wilson and Bill Clinton, and espoused a variety of liberal causes: opposing capital punishment from its earliest days, while favouring penal reform and decolonisation, as well as—more recently—gun control and gay marriage." Whether you perceive the articles in The Economist as left or right leaning, will tell you more about your own bias than that of the magazine.


As a general guide, if your source of political news spends more time talking about what the "other side" thinks, you are falling for the "straw man" rhetorical fallacy and your source is trying to manipulate you. If your source of political news make the opposing side sound scary, they're using appeal to fear, and again, just trying to manipulate you. There is no absolute truth and there are many paths to happiness and prosperity. There's one sure path to chaos, and that's failure to communicate.

This Wikipedia page is a good guide to perceived bias in media. Check out your favorite sites.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Constitution on Mosques

First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof... Article II, Section 2: "...he (the President) shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." Just last week, Sarah Palin is seen on camera telling an Alaskan woman that she was working to "...elect candidates that understand the constitution." Today, we hear, a woman who appears to be this same Sarah Palin urging, "Mr. President, should they or should they not build a mosque?" Does Ms. Palin not understand the Constitution? Congress is prohibited from making any laws prohibiting the free exercise of religion, and the President has absolutely no power to establish laws AT ALL -- not in the Constitution. He should not offer an opinion... he should simply, as he has done, restate the content of the Constitution. Ms. Palin should take the time to read the US Constitution and stop cynically trying to stir up political ...

After the 2016 Election

Yesterday was election day and today, I'm immensely depressed. Songwriter that I am, I often find inspiration in loss -- and today, I'm inspired, therefore, I write. The results of the "election" verify what we've suspected -- our country is deeply polarized. It's hard to imagine a more clear cut choice that Trump vs. Clinton. The results clearly delineate the two sides and it's very evenly divided -- the popular vote was roughly 50%-50% with Clinton slightly ahead. By examining the exit polls: If you are a white woman with a college degree, you voted for Clinton, 51% to 43%. If you are a white woman with no college degree, you voted for Trump, 62% to 34%. If you are a white male with a college degree, you voted for Trump, 54% to 39%. If you are a white man with no college degree, you voted for Trump 72% to 23%. ALL other groups sampled, women and men, college or no college, voted overwhelmingly for Ms. Clinton. For the record, I voted for Bern...

How to Lead a Band - Part I

OK... I'm not Bob Wills, Woody Herman, Benny Goodman, or Johann Strauss the Elder, nor even the Younger. I'm just a seat of the pants geetar picker who started his first band at age 12, and has been at it now for 64 years. If you're reading this after 2024, then add an appropriate number of years on to that figure... I assume that if you can read, you can probably add. I've played probably close to 10,000 gigs plus or minus, both as leader and sideman, so this blog comes from the perspective of both. I've played for as many as 25,000 people, and as few as zero... that's right -- ZERO. (I'm not sure I like ZERO, but I'd far preferred the ONE GOOD LISTENER to 25,000 inebriated idiots, just for the record.) First, here's a few things that leaders should be aware of, followed by some things that sidemen should be aware of. If you're in a "band" and it's very democratic and no one is really the leader... enjoy your childhood. This is...